GPU EVIDENCE

APPLICATION TIMES / COMFYUI

How much less
time waiting?

GPU unlock ComfyUI benchmarks, with actual seconds, model precision and the controls behind each comparison.

Reported application times, not our hardware tests. All three reports use Linux. A card name, quantized checkpoint or GEMM speedup alone does not predict your workflow.

USE A REPORTED COMPARISON

Same work. Two runtimes.

Select a configuration to translate throughput into seconds saved. The batch estimate repeats that report’s timing; it does not predict your own hardware.

MOSS-Image SFT · BF16

100 images: 1h 59m 58s stock → 1h 15m 40s unlocked. 44m 18s less waiting.

58.5% more throughput · 36.9% less time per image.

RTX 3090 Ti · 71.98 s → 45.40 s per image

Read controls and limitations ↓

BF16 vs INT8: compare the whole pipeline

In the 3090 Ti report, MOSS BF16 falls from 71.98 to 45.40 seconds. Its INT8 configuration changes from 27.31 to 27.23 seconds and remains quicker in this test. These are different precision configurations; the source’s stock/unlocked pixel checks do not establish equal quality between BF16 and INT8.

There is no single “INT8 gain.” The same report’s H3 INT8 ConvRot pipeline changes from 155.07 to 118.21 seconds. The two 3080 INT4 cases also improve, with unnamed checkpoints and mixed precision. Inspect the model and measured path rather than extending one row to all quantized models.

The reported comparisons

Download data & source links (JSON)

18 configurations from 3 reports; no cross-card ranking.

Stock and unlocked times for the same work within each report. Throughput = stock ÷ unlocked − 1; time saved = 1 − unlocked ÷ stock.
Model / workflowCard & sourcePrecision / pipelineStock / itemUnlocked / itemMore throughputLess time
MOSS-Image SFT1024×1024, 50 stepsRTX 3090 Tiu/under-_-nullBF1671.98 s45.40 s+58.5%36.9%
MOSS-Image SFT1024×1024, 50 stepsRTX 3090 Tiu/under-_-nullINT827.31 s27.23 s+0.3%0.3%
Qwen-Image 2.1 Turbo1024×1024, 8 stepsRTX 3090 Tiu/under-_-nullBF168.51 s5.41 s+57.3%36.4%
Z-Image Turbo1024×1024, 8 stepsRTX 3090 Tiu/under-_-nullBF166.79 s4.35 s+56.1%35.9%
FLUX.1 dev1152×896, 30 steps; checkpoint format is not compute precisionRTX 3090 Tiu/under-_-nullFP8 checkpoint / BF16 compute31.96 s20.66 s+54.7%35.4%
Z-Image Turbo + SageAttention1024×1024, 8 stepsRTX 3090 Tiu/under-_-nullBF166.47 s4.38 s+47.7%32.3%
Qwen-Image 2.1 Turbo1024×1024, 8 stepsRTX 3090 Tiu/under-_-nullINT83.92 s3.75 s+4.5%4.3%
Qwen-Image 2.1 Turbo + SageAttention1024×1024, 8 stepsRTX 3090 Tiu/under-_-nullINT83.92 s3.76 s+4.3%4.1%
Krea 2 Turbo1024×1024, 8 stepsRTX 3090 Tiu/under-_-nullBF1615.65 s10.70 s+46.3%31.6%
Krea 2 Turbo1024×1024, 8 stepsRTX 3090 Tiu/under-_-nullINT86.50 s5.98 s+8.7%8.0%
MiniMax H3864×480, 124 frames, audio, 20 steps; see video parity limitRTX 3090 Tiu/under-_-nullBF16253.27 s158.05 s+60.2%37.6%
MiniMax H3864×480, 124 frames, audio, 20 steps; mixed pipelineRTX 3090 Tiu/under-_-nullINT8 ConvRot155.07 s118.21 s+31.2%23.8%
LTX-2.5 distilled1280×704, 121 frames, audio, 8+3 steps, native 2× latent upscaleRTX 3090 Tiu/under-_-nullBF1670.81 s60.63 s+16.8%14.4%
LTX-2.5 distilled1280×704, 121 frames, audio, 8+3 steps, native 2× latent upscaleRTX 3090 Tiu/under-_-nullINT8 ConvRot48.02 s43.02 s+11.6%10.4%
SDXL / Illustrious832×1216, 30 steps, CFG 5; whole promptRTX 3060 12 GB GA104panoptek · issue #65FP1621.80 s16.20 s+34.6%25.7%
Anima 2B DiT832×1216, 30 steps, CFG 4.5; whole promptRTX 3060 12 GB GA104panoptek · issue #65BF1646.30 s33.20 s+39.5%28.3%
Unnamed diffusion model AWarm mean; checkpoint name not suppliedRTX 3080 10 GBldorii · issue #14INT4 / FP8 text encoder9.30 s7.98 s+16.5%14.2%
Unnamed diffusion model BWarm mean; checkpoint name not suppliedRTX 3080 10 GBldorii · issue #14INT4 / FP8 text encoder9.34 s8.17 s+14.3%12.5%

SOURCE REVIEW / 2026-10-25 01:18 UTC

Check what was actually measured

18 configurations are drawn from three self-reports, not 18 independent replications. Different models, resolutions, hardware and summary statistics make cross-card rankings invalid. We calculated the percentages and repeated-job totals from the reported seconds.

RTX 3090 Ti — u/under-_-null

EVGA FTW3, Ubuntu, NVIDIA 615.71.09, ComfyUI 0.42.1, 450 W ceiling in both conditions. Same prompts, seeds, files and workflows. Complete-request medians exclude initial model loading but include offloading where used. Still images: 15 runs after 3 warmups; video: 3 clips after 1 warmup.

Limits: One card and tester. Stock clocks reported; ambient and starting temperatures uncontrolled. Still-image RGB matched in 150 pairs. H3 video frames differed even within an unlocked boot; six audio pairs matched. No Windows, 3070, long-term stability or image-quality equivalence between different precisions established.

Read the original report ↗

RTX 3060 12 GB GA104 — panoptek · issue #65

PCI 10de:2487, Arch, gpu-unlock af28cbb, 170 W limit. Same workflow, seed and settings; second run after each stock/unlocked boot. Values below are whole-prompt times including VAE decode, not the separate iterations-per-second figures.

Limits: One card; no distribution or repeated application samples supplied. This GA104 board is not every RTX 3060. Suspend/resume untested. The author describes no noticeable INT8 change without a timing table.

Read the original report ↗

RTX 3080 10 GB — ldorii · issue #14

PNY, PCI 10de:2206, CachyOS, NVIDIA 615.71.09 open, 320 W cap. ComfyUI 0.42.1 in Docker; async offload and dynamic VRAM disabled. Two unnamed INT4 diffusion models, FP8 text encoder, 864×1536, 8 steps, Euler. Warm means use three seeds.

Limits: The source does not identify the two checkpoints. Warm results below exclude its separate cold runs. Four matched images per model were byte-identical. One board and setup; do not compare its absolute speed with another card or model.

Read the original report ↗

This page was assembled with AI assistance and source review. It does not install software or verify safety, longevity or compatibility. For Windows, 3070 and other systems, check the separate report finder; missing application data stays missing. Method, corrections and measurement choices.